Anonymous
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Log in
The Radical Buddhism Project
Search
Editing
Nepal
(section)
From The Radical Buddhism Project
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
More
More
Page actions
Read
Edit
History
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Caste, Women, and Reform within the Sangha === Bechert and Hartmann identify modernist features in the Nepalese Theravada movement: translation of texts, lay access, mass meditation, rationalism and demythologization, and a social philosophy that included the emancipation of women and a critical examination of the inherited social and political order.<ref>Bechert and Hartmann (1988), "Observations on the Reform of Buddhism in Nepal", pp. 18, 30.</ref> Caste was a practical problem. A monk who accepts food from a lower-caste donor may be refused by higher-caste lay supporters, so that many monasteries replaced alms rounds with invitations to lunch.<ref>Kloppenborg (1977), "Theravada Buddhism in Nepal", p. 312.</ref> Bechert and Hartmann report that Theravada monks call caste a secular matter, that laypeople threatened to withdraw their support if certain bounds were crossed, and that, although alms from untouchables are accepted and several untouchables have entered the community, the Sangha had not yet conferred full ordination on a monk of untouchable caste, who remained a novice.<ref>Bechert and Hartmann (1988), "Observations on the Reform of Buddhism in Nepal", pp. 22β23.</ref> LeVine and Gellner record that the monks Ashwaghosh and Buddhaghosh insisted from the start on taking alms rice from low-caste households, and that Theravada reached middle and lower Newar castes, notably the Maharjans, who became a main source of recruits.<ref>LeVine and Gellner (2005), ''Rebuilding Buddhism'', pp. 63, 281.</ref> Vipassana courses opened meditation, formerly restricted to Vajracharyas, Shakyas, and Udays, to a wider public.<ref>LeVine and Gellner (2005), ''Rebuilding Buddhism'', pp. 228β229.</ref> Nepal did not develop a [[Dalit Buddhism|Dalit Buddhist]] movement like the one that followed Ambedkar in India. Letizia, citing Hangen, notes that the Dharmodaya Sabha has not promoted Dalit conversion, that the Newars who control the public representation of Buddhism accept Janajati (ethnic) Buddhists but seem uncomfortable with Dalit Buddhists, and that the Janajati category, which excludes Hindu caste groups, impedes coalitions between Janajatis and Dalits.<ref>Letizia (2014), "Buddhist Activism, New Sanghas, and the Politics of Belonging", n. 34, citing Hangen (2007), pp. 20, 51; LeVine and Gellner (2005), ''Rebuilding Buddhism'', pp. 262, 266β267. Torri (2019) deliberately excludes Dalits from his study (para. [3]).</ref> The movement was nevertheless linked to the Indian one: according to the ''Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Buddhism'', the Triratna movement founded by Sangharakshita, which supports Ambedkarite converts, had centers in India and Nepal by the 1970s.<ref>Geary, David, & Sraman Mukherjee (2017). "Buddhism in Contemporary India". In: Jerryson, Michael (Ed.), ''The Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Buddhism'': 36β57. Oxford University Press, pp. 49β50. See [[Dalit Buddhism]].</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to The Radical Buddhism Project may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Copyright_Policy
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Navigation
Navigation
Main page
Discussion Forum
Recent changes
Random page
Wiki tools
Wiki tools
Page tools
Page tools
User page tools
More
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Page logs