Anonymous
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Log in
The Radical Buddhism Project
Search
Editing
Dalit Buddhism
(section)
From The Radical Buddhism Project
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
More
More
Page actions
Read
Edit
History
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Size and Shape of the Community == According to the ''Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Buddhism'', the 2001 census counted about 7.95 million Buddhists in India, of whom at least 5.83 million were former Untouchables from Maharashtra.<ref>Geary and Mukherjee (2017), "Buddhism in Contemporary India", p. 36.</ref> The 2011 census figure, of about 8.4 million with some three-quarters of them Marathi Buddhists, is given on the page on [[India]]. The Handbook adds that the movement is largely made up of Mahars and Jatavs, and, citing Beltz (2004), that anti-caste rhetoric within it has coexisted with a hardening of caste consciousness.<ref>Geary and Mukherjee (2017), "Buddhism in Contemporary India", p. 49 (reporting Beltz 2004).</ref> The Handbook also reports deep differences between Dalit and Tibetan Buddhism, which it presents as a barrier to a pan-Asian Buddhist unity.<ref>Geary and Mukherjee (2017), "Buddhism in Contemporary India", pp. 52β53 (after Singh 2010).</ref> By the Handbook's account, the state's use of Buddhism after 1947 was symbolic and cultural: the Sarnath lion capital became the state emblem in 1950, and the Buddha Jayanti of 1956 was declared "cultural (not religious)".<ref>Geary and Mukherjee (2017), "Buddhism in Contemporary India", pp. 46β47.</ref> Anand Kausalyayan (1905β1988), the Buddhist monk and writer, makes three claims about the legal and demographic position of Buddhists in a question-and-answer book of 1980. He says that the Buddhist population "should definitely exceed ten million" while the last census counted "thirty seven lakhs", an undercount that he blames on non-Buddhist enumerators; he does not name the census year. He also says that in "this so called secular state" a person who wishes to stand for a reserved seat "has to declare and prove that he is not a Buddhist."<ref>Kausalyayan, Anand (1992). ''An Intelligent Man's Guide to Buddhism''. [Publisher], Q. 257β260, pp. 174β175.</ref> Hunt reports, from Bhagwan Das, a related claim that denying reservations to Buddhist converts was a strategy to impede the spread of Buddhism.<ref>Hunt (2014), ''Hindi Dalit Literature'', p. 46.</ref> These are claims by participants and are reported as such. Kausalyayan's own list of the monks who re-established a foothold for Buddhism in India names Bodhananda, Mahavir, the Burmese monks Chandramani and Kittimaji, and Anagarika Dharmapala, and ends with Ambedkar's conversion.<ref>Kausalyayan (1992), ''Intelligent Man's Guide'', Q. 256, p. 174.</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to The Radical Buddhism Project may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Copyright_Policy
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Navigation
Navigation
Main page
Discussion Forum
Recent changes
Random page
Wiki tools
Wiki tools
Page tools
Page tools
User page tools
More
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Page logs