Wen Guangxi - Revision history

Lajos: /* Writings */

2026-08-05T01:41:09Z

Writings

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:41, 5 August 2026
Line 32:		Line 32:

	* Wen Guangxi 溫光熹 (1934). 《溫光熹先生嘉言錄》 [Recorded Sayings of Mr. Wen Guangxi]. Hong Kong. {{annotation\|An early collection of Wen's devotional and doctrinal writings from his Nationalist-era religious life; predates the "New Buddhism" synthesis and reflects Wen's more conventional Pure Land and Consciousness-Only formation.}}		* Wen Guangxi 溫光熹 (1934). 《溫光熹先生嘉言錄》 [Recorded Sayings of Mr. Wen Guangxi]. Hong Kong. {{annotation\|An early collection of Wen's devotional and doctrinal writings from his Nationalist-era religious life; predates the "New Buddhism" synthesis and reflects Wen's more conventional Pure Land and Consciousness-Only formation.}}
	* Wen Guangxi 溫光熹 (1948a). ~~〈做什麼？〉~~ [What Is to Be Done?]. 《覺有情》 9.5: 2–7; 9.6: 4–7. Reprinted in 《民國佛教期刊文獻集成》, vol. 89: 402–407, 428–431. {{annotation\|The inaugural essay of the New Buddhism series, its title deliberately echoing Lenin's pamphlet of the same name; frames Wen's return to Buddhist writing after years in the military and political establishment and first sketches the case for a Buddhist-Marxist synthesis. Its preface is also the main source for Wen's account of his own military career.}}		* Wen Guangxi 溫光熹 (1948a). 〈'''[[WG48ZSM\|做什麼？]]'''〉 ['''[[WG48ZSM-T\|What Is to Be Done?]]''']. 《覺有情》 9.5: 2–7; 9.6: 4–7. Reprinted in 《民國佛教期刊文獻集成》, vol. 89: 402–407, 428–431. {{annotation\|The inaugural essay of the New Buddhism series, its title deliberately echoing Lenin's pamphlet of the same name; frames Wen's return to Buddhist writing after years in the military and political establishment and first sketches the case for a Buddhist-Marxist synthesis. Its preface is also the main source for Wen's account of his own military career.}}
	* Wen Guangxi 溫光熹 (1948b). 〈新中國的佛法底使命〉 [The Mission of the Dharma in New China]. 《覺有情》 9.10: 2–4, 8–10, 16–17. Reprinted in 《民國佛教期刊文獻集成》, vol. 90: 30–32, 36–38, 44–45. {{annotation\|States the central claim of the synthesis most directly, that bodhicitta is the indispensable "engine" for building a new China, and contains Wen's sharpest argument against "free-will ethics" (自由心意的倫理學), including the hunchback joke and the appeal to dependent origination, alongside a warning against diluting the Dharma with secular frameworks.}}		* Wen Guangxi 溫光熹 (1948b). 〈新中國的佛法底使命〉 [The Mission of the Dharma in New China]. 《覺有情》 9.10: 2–4, 8–10, 16–17. Reprinted in 《民國佛教期刊文獻集成》, vol. 90: 30–32, 36–38, 44–45. {{annotation\|States the central claim of the synthesis most directly, that bodhicitta is the indispensable "engine" for building a new China, and contains Wen's sharpest argument against "free-will ethics" (自由心意的倫理學), including the hunchback joke and the appeal to dependent origination, alongside a warning against diluting the Dharma with secular frameworks.}}
	* Wen Guangxi 溫光熹 (1949a). 〈新佛法與新政治〉 [New Buddhism and New Politics]. 《覺有情》 10.2: 2–5; 10.3: 9–12. Reprinted in 《民國佛教期刊文獻集成》, vol. 90: 130–133, 157–160. {{annotation\|Opens with an epigraph from Lenin's ''What Is to Be Done?'', arguing that a properly organized Buddhism could supply the organizational and motivational resources Lenin identified as preconditions for revolution; also contains Wen's argument, citing Ouyang Jingwu, that the saṅgha jewel is not restricted to ordained monastics.}}		* Wen Guangxi 溫光熹 (1949a). 〈新佛法與新政治〉 [New Buddhism and New Politics]. 《覺有情》 10.2: 2–5; 10.3: 9–12. Reprinted in 《民國佛教期刊文獻集成》, vol. 90: 130–133, 157–160. {{annotation\|Opens with an epigraph from Lenin's ''What Is to Be Done?'', arguing that a properly organized Buddhism could supply the organizational and motivational resources Lenin identified as preconditions for revolution; also contains Wen's argument, citing Ouyang Jingwu, that the saṅgha jewel is not restricted to ordained monastics.}}

Lajos: /* How to Cite This Article */

2026-07-27T11:14:48Z

How to Cite This Article

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:14, 27 July 2026
Line 57:		Line 57:
	<!-- AUTHORSHIP CHANGE LOG		<!-- AUTHORSHIP CHANGE LOG
	First version, 27 July 2026. Main: Brons, Lajos. Other: (none).-->		First version, 27 July 2026. Main: Brons, Lajos. Other: (none).-->
	Brons, Lajos (~~2026~~). "Wen Guangxi". ''The Radical Buddhism Project''. Version of ~~27 July 2026~~. <nowiki>http://radicalbuddhism.net/wiki/Wen_Guangxi</nowiki>.		Brons, Lajos ({{REVISIONYEAR}}). "Wen Guangxi". ''The Radical Buddhism Project''. Version of {{#time: j F Y \| {{REVISIONYEAR}}-{{REVISIONMONTH}}-{{REVISIONDAY}} }}. <nowiki>http://radicalbuddhism.net/wiki/Wen_Guangxi</nowiki>.

	== Notes ==		== Notes ==

Lajos: /* Secondary Literature in Chinese */

2026-07-27T05:12:14Z

Secondary Literature in Chinese

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:12, 27 July 2026
Line 51:		Line 51:

	* He Jianming 何建明 (1998). 《佛法觀念的近代調適》 [Modern Adaptations of Buddhist Concepts]. Guangdong People's Publishing House, pp. 337–347. {{annotation\|One of only two secondary sources to discuss Wen's work in any depth; proposes a distinction between "new Buddhism" (新佛法), in which Buddhism accepts Marxist ideological primacy, and "Buddhist socialism" (佛教社會主義), in which it retains independent standing — a distinction this entry's Ideas section discusses in relation to Wen's own self-positioning.}}		* He Jianming 何建明 (1998). 《佛法觀念的近代調適》 [Modern Adaptations of Buddhist Concepts]. Guangdong People's Publishing House, pp. 337–347. {{annotation\|One of only two secondary sources to discuss Wen's work in any depth; proposes a distinction between "new Buddhism" (新佛法), in which Buddhism accepts Marxist ideological primacy, and "Buddhist socialism" (佛教社會主義), in which it retains independent standing — a distinction this entry's Ideas section discusses in relation to Wen's own self-positioning.}}
	* Li Guangliang 李廣良 (2001). 〈馬克思主義的佛教觀和佛教的馬克思主義觀〉 [The Marxist View of Buddhism and the Buddhist View of Marxism]. 《佛學研究》 10. {{annotation\|A broad survey of the relationship between Marxism and twentieth-century Chinese Buddhism; briefly situates Wen alongside Chen Mingshu (陳銘樞) as representative of lay Buddhists who attempted to fuse Marxism and Buddhist thought into a new systematic doctrine, though it offers no independent biographical material.}}		* Li Guangliang 李廣良 (2001). 〈馬克思主義的佛教觀和佛教的馬克思主義觀〉 ['''[[LG01MVB-T\|The Marxist View of Buddhism and the Buddhist View of Marxism]]''']. 《佛學研究》 10. {{annotation\|A broad survey of the relationship between Marxism and twentieth-century Chinese Buddhism; briefly situates Wen alongside Chen Mingshu (陳銘樞) as representative of lay Buddhists who attempted to fuse Marxism and Buddhist thought into a new systematic doctrine, though it offers no independent biographical material.}}
	* Yu Chiming 余池明 (2012). 《印光法師的故事》 [Stories of Master Yinguang]. East China Normal University Press, story 78. {{annotation\|A hagiographic compilation of anecdotes about the Pure Land master Yinguang, not a work of critical scholarship on Wen; nonetheless the only available account of Wen's formative years and his correspondence and encounters with Yinguang in 1930–1931, and should be used with appropriate source-critical caution.}}		* Yu Chiming 余池明 (2012). 《印光法師的故事》 [Stories of Master Yinguang]. East China Normal University Press, story 78. {{annotation\|A hagiographic compilation of anecdotes about the Pure Land master Yinguang, not a work of critical scholarship on Wen; nonetheless the only available account of Wen's formative years and his correspondence and encounters with Yinguang in 1930–1931, and should be used with appropriate source-critical caution.}}

Lajos at 23:13, 26 July 2026

2026-07-26T23:13:02Z

Show changes

Lajos: Created page with "{{Under Construction}} (placeholder) Category:Wen Guangxi Category:China Category:Biographies"

2026-07-26T00:04:01Z

Created page with "{{Under Construction}} (placeholder) Category:Wen Guangxi Category:China Category:Biographies"

New page

{{Under Construction}}

(placeholder)

[[Category:Wen Guangxi]]
[[Category:China]]
[[Category:Biographies]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:41, 5 August 2026
Line 32:		Line 32:

	* Wen Guangxi 溫光熹 (1934). 《溫光熹先生嘉言錄》 [Recorded Sayings of Mr. Wen Guangxi]. Hong Kong. {{annotation\|An early collection of Wen's devotional and doctrinal writings from his Nationalist-era religious life; predates the "New Buddhism" synthesis and reflects Wen's more conventional Pure Land and Consciousness-Only formation.}}		* Wen Guangxi 溫光熹 (1934). 《溫光熹先生嘉言錄》 [Recorded Sayings of Mr. Wen Guangxi]. Hong Kong. {{annotation\|An early collection of Wen's devotional and doctrinal writings from his Nationalist-era religious life; predates the "New Buddhism" synthesis and reflects Wen's more conventional Pure Land and Consciousness-Only formation.}}
	* Wen Guangxi 溫光熹 (1948a). ~~〈做什麼？〉~~ [What Is to Be Done?]. 《覺有情》 9.5: 2–7; 9.6: 4–7. Reprinted in 《民國佛教期刊文獻集成》, vol. 89: 402–407, 428–431. {{annotation\|The inaugural essay of the New Buddhism series, its title deliberately echoing Lenin's pamphlet of the same name; frames Wen's return to Buddhist writing after years in the military and political establishment and first sketches the case for a Buddhist-Marxist synthesis. Its preface is also the main source for Wen's account of his own military career.}}		* Wen Guangxi 溫光熹 (1948a). 〈'''[[WG48ZSM\|做什麼？]]'''〉 ['''[[WG48ZSM-T\|What Is to Be Done?]]''']. 《覺有情》 9.5: 2–7; 9.6: 4–7. Reprinted in 《民國佛教期刊文獻集成》, vol. 89: 402–407, 428–431. {{annotation\|The inaugural essay of the New Buddhism series, its title deliberately echoing Lenin's pamphlet of the same name; frames Wen's return to Buddhist writing after years in the military and political establishment and first sketches the case for a Buddhist-Marxist synthesis. Its preface is also the main source for Wen's account of his own military career.}}
	* Wen Guangxi 溫光熹 (1948b). 〈新中國的佛法底使命〉 [The Mission of the Dharma in New China]. 《覺有情》 9.10: 2–4, 8–10, 16–17. Reprinted in 《民國佛教期刊文獻集成》, vol. 90: 30–32, 36–38, 44–45. {{annotation\|States the central claim of the synthesis most directly, that bodhicitta is the indispensable "engine" for building a new China, and contains Wen's sharpest argument against "free-will ethics" (自由心意的倫理學), including the hunchback joke and the appeal to dependent origination, alongside a warning against diluting the Dharma with secular frameworks.}}		* Wen Guangxi 溫光熹 (1948b). 〈新中國的佛法底使命〉 [The Mission of the Dharma in New China]. 《覺有情》 9.10: 2–4, 8–10, 16–17. Reprinted in 《民國佛教期刊文獻集成》, vol. 90: 30–32, 36–38, 44–45. {{annotation\|States the central claim of the synthesis most directly, that bodhicitta is the indispensable "engine" for building a new China, and contains Wen's sharpest argument against "free-will ethics" (自由心意的倫理學), including the hunchback joke and the appeal to dependent origination, alongside a warning against diluting the Dharma with secular frameworks.}}
	* Wen Guangxi 溫光熹 (1949a). 〈新佛法與新政治〉 [New Buddhism and New Politics]. 《覺有情》 10.2: 2–5; 10.3: 9–12. Reprinted in 《民國佛教期刊文獻集成》, vol. 90: 130–133, 157–160. {{annotation\|Opens with an epigraph from Lenin's ''What Is to Be Done?'', arguing that a properly organized Buddhism could supply the organizational and motivational resources Lenin identified as preconditions for revolution; also contains Wen's argument, citing Ouyang Jingwu, that the saṅgha jewel is not restricted to ordained monastics.}}		* Wen Guangxi 溫光熹 (1949a). 〈新佛法與新政治〉 [New Buddhism and New Politics]. 《覺有情》 10.2: 2–5; 10.3: 9–12. Reprinted in 《民國佛教期刊文獻集成》, vol. 90: 130–133, 157–160. {{annotation\|Opens with an epigraph from Lenin's ''What Is to Be Done?'', arguing that a properly organized Buddhism could supply the organizational and motivational resources Lenin identified as preconditions for revolution; also contains Wen's argument, citing Ouyang Jingwu, that the saṅgha jewel is not restricted to ordained monastics.}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:12, 27 July 2026
Line 51:		Line 51:

	* He Jianming 何建明 (1998). 《佛法觀念的近代調適》 [Modern Adaptations of Buddhist Concepts]. Guangdong People's Publishing House, pp. 337–347. {{annotation\|One of only two secondary sources to discuss Wen's work in any depth; proposes a distinction between "new Buddhism" (新佛法), in which Buddhism accepts Marxist ideological primacy, and "Buddhist socialism" (佛教社會主義), in which it retains independent standing — a distinction this entry's Ideas section discusses in relation to Wen's own self-positioning.}}		* He Jianming 何建明 (1998). 《佛法觀念的近代調適》 [Modern Adaptations of Buddhist Concepts]. Guangdong People's Publishing House, pp. 337–347. {{annotation\|One of only two secondary sources to discuss Wen's work in any depth; proposes a distinction between "new Buddhism" (新佛法), in which Buddhism accepts Marxist ideological primacy, and "Buddhist socialism" (佛教社會主義), in which it retains independent standing — a distinction this entry's Ideas section discusses in relation to Wen's own self-positioning.}}
	* Li Guangliang 李廣良 (2001). 〈馬克思主義的佛教觀和佛教的馬克思主義觀〉 [The Marxist View of Buddhism and the Buddhist View of Marxism]. 《佛學研究》 10. {{annotation\|A broad survey of the relationship between Marxism and twentieth-century Chinese Buddhism; briefly situates Wen alongside Chen Mingshu (陳銘樞) as representative of lay Buddhists who attempted to fuse Marxism and Buddhist thought into a new systematic doctrine, though it offers no independent biographical material.}}		* Li Guangliang 李廣良 (2001). 〈馬克思主義的佛教觀和佛教的馬克思主義觀〉 ['''[[LG01MVB-T\|The Marxist View of Buddhism and the Buddhist View of Marxism]]''']. 《佛學研究》 10. {{annotation\|A broad survey of the relationship between Marxism and twentieth-century Chinese Buddhism; briefly situates Wen alongside Chen Mingshu (陳銘樞) as representative of lay Buddhists who attempted to fuse Marxism and Buddhist thought into a new systematic doctrine, though it offers no independent biographical material.}}
	* Yu Chiming 余池明 (2012). 《印光法師的故事》 [Stories of Master Yinguang]. East China Normal University Press, story 78. {{annotation\|A hagiographic compilation of anecdotes about the Pure Land master Yinguang, not a work of critical scholarship on Wen; nonetheless the only available account of Wen's formative years and his correspondence and encounters with Yinguang in 1930–1931, and should be used with appropriate source-critical caution.}}		* Yu Chiming 余池明 (2012). 《印光法師的故事》 [Stories of Master Yinguang]. East China Normal University Press, story 78. {{annotation\|A hagiographic compilation of anecdotes about the Pure Land master Yinguang, not a work of critical scholarship on Wen; nonetheless the only available account of Wen's formative years and his correspondence and encounters with Yinguang in 1930–1931, and should be used with appropriate source-critical caution.}}